Monday, July 30, 2012
DVD and Blu Ray release dates for the week of July 30th
*Blu ray only
**DVD only
Here are the Blu ray and DVD releases for July 31st:
Le Havre, Damsels in Distress, ATM, Hijacked, LOL, The Bunny Game, Forever Marilyn*, The Seven Year Itch*, Gentlemen Prefer Blondes*, How to Marry a Millionaire*, There's no Business like Show Business*, River of no Return*, Total Recall*, The Grand Illusion*, Hatfields and McCoys, Mystery Science Theater 3000 Volume 14**, Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids (series)**, The Magic School Bus**, Melrose Place (series)**, Shark Week: 25th Anniversary Collection
"Man of Steel" teaser trailer offers something other than the typical superhero rhetoric
I have to admit that when I went to see The Dark Knight Rises I was eagerly anticipating the teaser trailer for next year's Superman re-boot, Man of Steel. At first I was extremely disappointed because it didn't show really anything at all. There was no Superman vs. Zod scenes, no shots of The Daily Planet; hell there wasn't even a shot of Amy Adams as Lois Lane! Instead what we got was a very dreary depiction of a grungy Clark Kent moonlighting as a fisherman and in general looking like an outcast. Only at the end of the trailer was Superman (Henry Cavill) flying.
The more I thought about it though and after watching it I few times, I changed my mind. This trailer comes across as very intriguing because it sets up a story of what kind of Superman audiences are going to see next. I have to admit the voiceover and music* just gives me chills. With Zack Synder (300, Watchmen) at the helm and Christopher Nolan producing, I have a very good feeling about Man of Steel. And after the overwhelming disappointment that was Superman Returns, I think the world is in desperate need of a good Superman movie.
Interestingly enough, Warner Bros. released two cuts of the teaser trailer with different voiceovers. One had Jonathan Kent (Kevin Costner) Superman's Earth father doing the voiceover http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jKWJZsjm5U and the other had Jor-El (Russell Crowe) Superman's biological father doing the other http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-toIu5JscE&feature=relmfu. Both are excellent but I prefer the Jor-El version.
Man of Steel opens June 14th, 2013.
*The background music is from The Lord of the Rings movies.
Drew Goddard dishes on his involvement in the "World War Z" rewrite
Several weeks back I reported that next summer's potential box office hit World War Z, was on shaky ground. Studio execs were extremely disappointed with the script and 5-7 weeks of re-shoots will begin within the next month. Thankfully, screenwriter Drew Goddard (The Cabin in the Woods) has been brought in to revamp the third act of World War Z which was the main source of contention at the studio.
However, numerous rumors have flown about indicating that Goddard was going to re-write the ENTIRE script, so he spoke to "Collider" in order to clear the air. Goddard states:
“I think a lot of that got blown out of proportion. It really was like, they asked me to come look at the movie and give ideas on how to help, and that’s what happened. That happens all the time, I don’t know why this got blown up with World War Z and it suddenly became a big thing. It’s the sort of thing that happens with screenwriters all the time where you give your ideas on what could help, you write some scenes for people… I feel bad for the sort of magnifying glass that that movie’s under because this is just a normal part of the process, this is just what happens… My involvement was just watch the movie, give some ideas, write some scenes that might help, ADR, just sort of fill in stuff, which is what I did.”
Having just read the book, "Tales from Development Hell" I can categorically say that Goddard is right on the money. This is nothing new in Hollywood. Unfortunately, I also think that when this situation happens, especially when the movie is based on excellent source material, the chances are 50/50 that things will work out alright. I have to respect the fact that studio wants to do re-shoots because they think WWZ is a disaster. That shows me that they care about putting out a good product, at least on the surface. Whether or not the adjustments pay off will have to wait until next year.
In an effort to make sure Chris Tucker stays employed, "Rush Hour 4" is coming
I never was a big fan of the Rush Hour franchise. I firmly believe that the only reason Jackie Chan* is known in the United States is because of Quentin Tarantino, and Chris Tucker, well, let's just say I find him painfully unfunny and leave it at that.
However, Hollywood really isn't interested in putting out much that is new or original anymore (see 21 Jump Street), so "Craveonline's" report that Rush Hour 4 is in the early stages of development really isn't that surprising, even if it is unwarranted. Creator/producer Arthur Sarkissian is actively working on the fourth edition of the franchise, and although no script currently exists, he has "four or five names" that he's "roaming" right now to helm this impending cinematic masterpiece.
As for the story Sarkissian wants to return to Rush Hour's roots (natch) and make the story grittier. Sarkissian also didn't rule out Brett Ratner's return as director saying, "If he wants to do it he's more than welcome to do it but he's got to do it the right way." I guess that means without anti-Semitic comments. (Sorry Mel Gibson no soup for you!)
Chris Tucker and Jackie Chan are reportedly both interested in returning so it's probably a safe bet this movie will be gracing the local cinemaplex in the not too distant future.
*I'll never forgive Jackie Chan for being in the remake of The Karate Kid.
Friday, July 27, 2012
DVD and Blu Ray Releases for the week of July 23rd
*Blu ray only
**DVD only
Here are the DVDs and Blu rays being released this week on Tuesday July 24th:
Silent House, Footnote, On the Inside, The Deep Blue Sea, Meeting Evil**, Jiro Dreams of Sushi, The Last Days of Disco*, Metropolitan*, Mystery Men*, Life*, The Island of Dr Moreau*, Boss season 1, Children's Hospital Season 3**, Star Trek the Next Generation Season 1*
**DVD only
Here are the DVDs and Blu rays being released this week on Tuesday July 24th:
Silent House, Footnote, On the Inside, The Deep Blue Sea, Meeting Evil**, Jiro Dreams of Sushi, The Last Days of Disco*, Metropolitan*, Mystery Men*, Life*, The Island of Dr Moreau*, Boss season 1, Children's Hospital Season 3**, Star Trek the Next Generation Season 1*
Lady Gaga to show her ah-ah-ah-acting face in "Machete Kills"
Well you can't say director Robert Rodriguez doesn't make interesting casting choices.
Rodriguez just reported the other day via his Twitter page that he just finished working with none other than Lady Gaga in his next film Machete Kills. This will be Gaga's first big screen role. Her character's name is La Chameleon although what her character actually does remains a mystery.
Machete Kills is certainly shaping up to be an interesting film with Vanessa Hudgens, Sofia Vergara, William Sadler, Demian Bichir, Michelle Rodriguez, Mel Gibson, Charlie Sheen, Amber Heard, and Edward James Olmos all part of the cast. Whoo.
Machete Kills releases sometime next year.
Peter Jackson's "The Hobbit" to become a trilogy?
Please don't let this be true.
Awhile back at this year's Comic Con rumors began to spread that Peter Jackson had filmed so much material for his upcoming Hobbit film that he was seriously considering turning it into a trilogy. At the time I thought that's all they were: rumors. After all The Hobbit novel is only about 350 pages long so I didn't see the need to split it into three films. In any event The Fellowship of the Ring is over 500 pages long and Jackson managed to cover that book in just one movie.
Well apparently things are more serious than I thought. According to "THR" sources close to the production report that Jackson wants to turn the series into a trilogy and is working hard to negotiate a third film even as I write. Along with producers Fran Walsh and Phillippa Boyens, the three are exploring the possible logistics of releasing a third film. The problem is that there has to be financial backing and new contracts have to be agreed upon by the rather large cast. This says to me that Jackson wants to film even more and that the third film in this possible trilogy would serve as a "bridge" to The Lord of the Rings movies.
This may surprise you, considering how much I love The Lord of the Rings movies, but I cry greed on this one. To me this appears as nothing more than a quick cash grab masquerading as a desire to bring the fans more of Middle Earth. It makes me sick. There's no reason to make this a trilogy. In fact I saw little reason to make The Hobbit into a duology considering the book's length. To be fair this is par for the course in Hollywood lately as Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows was split into two parts, as was Breaking Dawn, and reports state that the final Hunger Games movie, Mockingjay, will be made into two parts. I absolutely despise this garbage. Don't try to sell me on the "there are so many plot points we want to please the fans and have to make two movies" argument. As Sheldon Cooper from the "The Big Bang Theory" might say, "that's hokum." It's about straight cash homie. Don't let anyone tell you different.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey releases this December.
Review: The Dark Knight Rises
Plot: Eight years after the events of The Dark Knight, Gotham City has reached a period of relative peace. As a consequence of former district attorney Harvey Dent's death, the "Dent Act" has ground organized crime to a screeching halt. Unfortunately, peace alludes both Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) and Police Commissioner James Gordon (Gary Oldman). Both know that Batman took the fall for Dent's murderous rampage. Gordon's guilty conscience is beginning to eat away at him. Meanwhile, Bruce Wayne/Batman has become a virtual recluse in Wayne Manor, recovering from both physical and emotional injuries. However, when the actions of a mysterious cat burglar named Selina Kyle (Anne Hathaway) point Bruce in the direction of a new criminal element led by terrorist Bane (Tom Hardy), he realizes the city he loves may be in grave danger. To prevent catastrophe, Bruce will have to face the truth about his past, heal his emotional and physical trauma, and once again take up the mantle of The Batman.
Review: There are very few good third films in a franchise. For every Return of the Jedi and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, there's a Godfather Part III or a Superman III. I'm happy to say that The Dark Knight Rises does not fall into that category. In point of fact in may be the best third film in a franchise ever.
To say I had high expectations going into this film is like saying the Penn State football program is having minor problems. My expectations were astronomical, and while TDKR wasn't as good as it's predecessor, it was still a resounding success that works on every level. In fact it is such a multi-layered film with so many interesting dynamics, that I had to see it twice--once in the regular theater and once in IMAX. (And in case you're on the fence, go see it in IMAX, it is definitely worth your time.) I actually liked the film better a second time. TDKR continues to dominate my thoughts and for me that's always a sign of a good film. If someone offered tonight to go see it again, I'd drop whatever plans I had and head out.
The reason the Batman franchise has been so successful over the last eight years is a direct result of director Christopher Nolan's vision. Nolan has mastered the art of blending spectacle with a strong plot. Furthermore, he's able to address larger societal issues such as class warfare, energy concerns, and the disparity between the rich and the poor in our own society. Nolan balances these societal issues against the intense personal issues that individuals deal with everyday. Two that instantly jump to mind are Bruce's inner turmoil with his traumatic past, something that eats away at his very soul, or Selina Kyle's personal desire to start anew after leading a criminal life. Nolan has the rare ability to point a mirror at society and individuals that is not judgemental but gets the audience to think. He also went back to the early film era for The Dark Knight Rises, as you can see the influence of films like Metropolis throughout the picture. In particular TDKR shows how Gotham is actually rotting from the bottom up, just like in director Fritz Lang's 1927 classic.
Yet Nolan's vision would be futile if not his and brother Jonathan's excellent script. The plot is fast paced and engaging, but takes time for strong emotional scenes. Dialogue is potent and believable although occasionally hokey. (Hey it is a superhero film after all!) At a 2 hour and 45 minute run time I was amazed that the movie flew by so fast. With all the engaging and diverse plot points, I could have watched another hour. And the ending in particular will blow your mind. (Although if you are a huge fan of the Caped Crusader you might guess what's coming.) Christopher and his brother should collaborate on every script as far as I'm concerned.
Academy award winners Hans Zimmer and Wally Pfister once again pack a one two punch as musician and cinematographer respectively, in TDKR. Zimmer's excellent score compliments Pfister's intimate screen moments, as well as the huge action set pieces. And believe me Nolan went all out with the action sequences in this movie. The destruction of Rogue Stadium is nothing compared to the last 45 minutes of the movie which is an all out assault on the senses.
Christian Bale manages to deliver his best performance as Batman/Bruce Wayne yet. The physical damage is devastating but the Academy Award winner excels at actualizing Bruce Wayne's inner turmoil. How his pain affects his relationships, in particular Bruce's relationship with Alfred, (Michael Caine) is a sight to see. Caine, as good as he is in this film, unfortunately gets a little short changed in TDKR. I was expecting him to have a larger role but based on what happens in the story his absence does make sense.
Two newcomers to the franchise, Joseph Gordon Levitt's Detective John Blake and Anne Hathaway's Selina Kyle impress immensely. Blake comes across as an idealist, someone who still believes in the Batman and like Bruce, shares a troubled past. In fact in many ways Blake server as a mirror to Bruce Wayne/Batman. The scene where John Blake and Bruce Wayne discuss Blake's horrible past is particularly riveting. And what can I say about Anne Hathaway? She's the perfect Catwoman (although she's never referred to by that name in the movie.) Hathaway's performance puts Michelle Pfeiffer's Catwoman in Batman Returns to shame. Selina Kyle comes across as a slick thief, doing whatever it takes to survive, but at the same time ambivalent about what she does to make a living. It's a throwback to the Catwoman of DC Comics, something that I think the fans will appreciate.
And then of course there is Tom Hardy as Bane. Hardy was handed an impossible task by being the next villain to follow Heath Ledger's Joker*. There was no way he'd be able to top or even give an equal performance, and he doesn't in TDKR. But boy is he damn good! Bane is the first villain that Batman has come across that is really a match for him intellectually and physically. Whereas The Joker just wanted "to watch the world burn" Bane has a distinct plan he's trying to carry out. And anyone who gets in his way is going to summarily get his ass kicked. What's amazing about Hardy's performance is that except for one brief scene, he wears a mask the entire movie. Yet despite this he's able to convey so much just through his eyes and his physical gestures. There was a part in the film where he puts his hand on another character's shoulder and the implied menace and promise of violence literally gave me chills. Hardy is quickly becoming this generation's Marlon Brando and it's only a matter of time before he wins an Academy Award. As his for his "voice" that everyone was complaining about? Except for maybe one or two lines I understood everything Hardy said, and although his accent was slightly off putting at times, it was definitely a bold choice.
I seriously pondered for a long time what to actually rate The Dark Knight Rises because it's not as good as The Dark Knight. (Just for your information I consider Batman Begins a 10/10 and The Dark Knight a 15/10). Yet I realized that doesn't mean I shouldn't give TDKR a perfect rating. After all I consider Schindler's List and The Shawshank Redemption to both be 10s but I like the latter more than the former. I kind of equate TDKR to The Godfather Part II in some ways. At the end of the day, The Dark Knight Rises stands out as an exciting, engaging, and riveting spectacle that works on every level. The acting is superb, the script brilliant, and the set pieces, score, and cinematography are stupendous. It's easily the best film I've seen so far in 2012.
My rating: 10/10
*Incidentally I consider Heath Ledger's performance as The Joker to not only be the best comic book villain performance of all time but also one of the best onscreen villains of all time, right up there with Hannibal Lecter and Norman Bates.
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
No "WOW" for Raimi
I never got into "World of Warcraft" mainly because I thought it would get too addicting and I've literally seen relationships ruined over the game. However, the multiplayer online game does contain a lot of the things that appeal to my inner geek such as elves, dragons, orcs, wizards, and the like. Because of the popularity of the game, it was probably inevitable that a movie version would eventually come out.
For several months director Sam Raimi (The Evil Dead, Spiderman) had been linked to the "WOW" project. However, when asked this past week at Comic-Con about his involvement, Raimi stated that Blizzard Entertainment no longer has him directing the film. This is due in large part to Raimi's current project OZ: The Great and Powerful due to release next year.
According to "Crave Online," Blizzard Entertainment hasn't officially announced that Raimi is off the project or who the new director will be. No timetable has been set for production and there is no official release date. Personally, I could care less if this film gets made. Why you ask? Just try watching the Dungeons and Dragons movie and you'll know why. If you can get past the first ten minutes anyway.
OZ: The Great and Powerful opens next year and stars James Franco and Mila Kunis.
R.I.P. Sage Stallone
Well this is certainly tragic news.
Actor, writer, director, and producer Sage Stallone, son of action star Sylvester Stallone, was found dead last Friday in his Studio City home just a week before he was to be married. He was 36 years old.
Best known for his role as Rocky Jr. in Rocky V, Stallone had recently had several teeth pulled and was treating the pain with prescription Vicodin. The police found several bottles of the prescription medication in his home.
At this time the death is being ruled an accidental overdose, although Sylvester Stallone has hired a private investigator to determine if his son's death was caused by foul play.
Although Sage Stallone only acted in a few films, he also co-founded Grindhouse Rereleasing, an LA company dedicated to the restoration and preservation of exploitation films. Stallone also directed several short films including the film Vic which won the 2006 Boston Film Festival "Best New Filmmaker Award."
This is truly a senseless death and it is my sincere hope that this was an accidental drug overdose and nothing more. My heart goes out to Sylvester Stallone and the rest of his family. Sage Stallone is survived by his father Sylvester, his mother Sasha, his grandmother Jackie, his brother Seargeoh, and half sisters Sophia, Sistine, and Scarlet.
Enough already Star Trek!
That's it. I'm done. This is officially the LAST post I'm doing about the next Star Trek villain until JJ Abrams or the studio makes an official announcement.
Although Karl Urban recently stated on his tour for the upcoming Dredd that the next Star Trek villain would be Gary Mitchell (look him up I'm not delving into it) producer Roberto Orci has now come out and said that is not the case. Orci would only state that "sequels are about the bad guy." Really Bobby? That's deeper than Jerry Springer's final thought.
In a somewhat less vague statement, Orci did tell "TrekMovie" that the sequel would not be called Star Trek 2 although he did not indicate what the subtitle would be. I figured this would probably be the case. After all Star Trek II always and forevermore will be The Wrath of Khan.
In any case I wish that the producers of this film would just come out and say who the villain is already because, like many people in the Trek community, I'm getting tired of the rampant speculation and misinformation.
Guys relax! It's just a movie!
Anyone who's spent a significant amount of time around me knows I love movies.* In fact most people who meet me for the first time find that fact out about me usually in the first five minutes.
Having said that, I would like to stress that I am a fan of movies not a fanatic. I'd like to draw that distinction because the news I saw earlier today about what's going on over at rottentomates.com is incredibly disturbing.
Unless you live in a bomb shelter, you probably know that The Dark Knight Rises opens this Friday. There are already over a hundred reviews of the film and the approval rate is hovering around 85% positive. Here's the general consensus straight from the horse's mouth:
The Dark Knight Rises is an ambitious, thoughtful, and potent action film that concludes Christopher Nolan's franchise in spectacular fashion, even if it doesn't quite meet the high standard set by its predecessor.
That sounds about right and it's pretty much on par with what I'm expecting out of the film. But like any film, there are going to be a certain amount of people who just...don't...like it. And I'm ok with that. There are classic films that I absolutely can't stand, but when you get right down to the nitty gritty, my reviews count for precisely dick. I'd like to think that my reviews are insightful, but I certainly don't expect everyone to agree with me. I never base whether I see a film on how a critic reacts to it and neither should you. I'm sure that Norbit is probably someones favorite film of all time and just because I think the movie sucks, doesn't mean I have the right to tell you how to feel about it.
Unfortunately not everyone shares my opinion, such as several certified ass-hats over at rottentomatoes.com. Certain critics have been receiving death threats (death threats!) because of their negative reviews of TDKR. As a consequence rottentomatoes has suspended reviews of the film until further notice.
Really? Really guys? You feel so strongly about this film that you're going to drop death threats on critics? Shame on you! Apparently these jack-wagons not only have the IQ of an amoeba, they also feel confident enough to casually spew their vitriol behind the faceless curtain of the Internet. Way to go you cowards!
I have a message to all these wanna-be, morbidly obese, superhero obsessed, Comic Book Guy from "The Simpsons" virgins, living in their parents' basements and masturbating to Anime porn. Move out, get a job, and grow up. I have exactly zero respect for people who pull this shit. Even if I vehemently disagree with a critic I would never stoop so low as to send death threats.
To quote William Shatner: "Get a life."
*Of course I love movies! I run a freakin' movie blog for goodness sake!
No "Wolverine" for Biel after all
A few days ago "Deadline" and "Collider" reported that uber-hottie/actress/Justin Timberlake's* fiance Jessica Biel would be portraying the character Viper in next year's The Wolverine.
Sadly it is not to be.
"Collider' reports that negotiations broke down between Biel and Fox, and that Biel has officially pulled out of the project. Sigh. Would have been nice to see her in that skin-tight green outfit.
In any case I have zero idea who Viper actually is. I'm not an avid comic book reader by any stretch of the imagination, but even I had to Google this character. Apparently she has significant ties to the Wolverine Japan story arc that the next film explores. What's also interesting is that Viper is a former Captain America villain and has ties to both S.H.I.E.L.D. and The Avengers. One wonders if Viper will appear in the next Avengers film.
With less than a month to go before principal photography begins, expect Biel's replacement to be announced sooner rather than later.
The Wolverine releases July 26th of next year.
*How lucky is Justin Timberlake??
Monday, July 16, 2012
Blu Ray and DVD release dates for the week of July 16th!
*Denotes Blu-Ray only
**Denotes DVD only
Here are the films and television shows being released on Tuesday July 17th:
Friends with Kids, Casa de Mi Padre, Get the Gringo, Salmon Fishing in the Yemen, Intruders, Lockout, Mean Streets*, High Noon*, Invasion of the Body Snatchers*, Down by Law*, The Butterfly Effect*, Sanctuary Season 4, Leverage Season 4**, Eureka Season 5**, Alphas Season 1**
**Denotes DVD only
Here are the films and television shows being released on Tuesday July 17th:
Friends with Kids, Casa de Mi Padre, Get the Gringo, Salmon Fishing in the Yemen, Intruders, Lockout, Mean Streets*, High Noon*, Invasion of the Body Snatchers*, Down by Law*, The Butterfly Effect*, Sanctuary Season 4, Leverage Season 4**, Eureka Season 5**, Alphas Season 1**
Robocop reboot year setting is closer than expected....
I'm still not sure about the Robocop reboot but since I'm planning on giving the Total Recall reboot a chance and the talented actors that are joining the project, I'll probably see it.
In any event "Bloody Disgusting" reports that Robocop will be set in the year 2029*. Now at first I thought this was a little soon for my taste. I know it's a movie and there's a certain amount of suspension of disbelief, but is mankind really only 17 years away from making cyborgs? I didn't think so. But then I began to think about it from the perspective of my own job at Verizon Wireless. Look how far the cell phone has come in 10 years. In 2002 the text message was a novel idea. Hell look at how far smart phones have come in the last three years! Comparing the original Motorola Droid (2009) to the Samsung Galaxy III that was just released is like comparing an amoeba to an orangutan. Ergo why couldn't we have cyborgs in 2029? Technology after all is progressing at a more increased rate than at any other time in mankind's history.
But I digress. Here's a synopsis of the film:
“In RoboCop, the year is 2029 and multinational conglomerate OmniCorp is at the centre of robot technology. Their drones are winning American wars around the globe and now they want to bring this technology to the home front. Alex Murphy is a loving husband, father and good cop doing his best to stem the tide of crime and corruption in Detroit. After he is critically injured in the line of duty, OmniCorp utilises their remarkable science of robotics to save Alex’s life. He returns to the streets of his beloved city with amazing new abilities, but with issues a regular man has never had to face before.”
Robocop hits theaters August 2013.
*Film fans may note that 2029 is also a significant date for another movie franchise. It's the year Judgement Day (the nuclear holocaust) occurs according to the first two Terminator films.
Hellboy 3 coming???
Despite the fact that I love Guillermo Del Toro* as a director (Pan's Labyrinth was awesome and I was sad to see him leave The Hobbit movies) I was never a fan of the Hellboy franchise. The first one was ok but the second was God-awful despite the awesome set designs. However, fans of the films (especially the second) may recall that (spoiler alert!) the sequel ends on cliffhanger with Hellboy's girlfriend pregnant with twins.
As to why a third and final film has not graced the screen yet? Well you can kind of blame that one on Del Toro. The man has a ton of projects he's linked to; movies that he's writing, producing, directing, or all three. With all the balls he's juggling he's about ready to have a reoccurring show next to Carrot-Top in Vegas.
Well you can add one more ball to the group.
According to "Entertainment Weekly" and "Mother Nature Network" (?) Del Toro plans to team-up with his old buddy Ron Pearlman** to try to bring a third Hellboy to the screen. Del Toro stated, "I can say publicly that we are together in trying to do Hellboy 3." But then again talk is cheap and "we are together" is a far cry from "here's the release date."
After years of publicly stating that he could not or would not do a third film, a simple act of kindness changed Del Toro's mind. Recently Ron Pearlman, who plays Hellboy, worked with the Make a Wish Foundation. A six year old boy with leukemia wished that he could meet and become Hellboy. So what did Ronny do? He showed up to the kid's place in full Hellboy regalia with a makeup crew that turned the boy into a miniature Hellboy. He even ordered gourmet burgers, fries, and shakes for everyone.
Del Toro stated Pearlman's act of kindness really moved him and reminded Del Toro how important this franchise and the character is to people. No word yet on casting, script, or start date but for just the sake of this sick kid I hope the movie gets made.
*I highly recommend "The Strain" vampire trilogy he wrote with author Chuck Hogan. Freaking amazing.
**Ron Pearlman's performance as Clay on "Sons of Anarchy" is just amazing. Single-handedly the most underrated and under appreciated show on television.
Marvel's Phase Two Comic Book films are announced including..."Ant-Man"???
Just when you thought comic book movies were going to die down---wait WTF? No one thinks that! How can that be? There are literally dozens (hundreds?) of superheroes that have not yet been exploited for profit--errr---graced the silver screen. Moreover, there's still plenty of money to be made on sequels. Nope. Just like Kristen Stewart, Donald Trump, and "Fifty Shades of Gray," comic book films are not going away.
And production company Marvel knows it.
"Deadline" and "Ain't it Cool News" reports that Marvel has unveiled comic book sequel titles for Thor and Captain America. They've also released teaser posters for both films as well as upcoming movies Iron Man 3, The Guardians of the Galaxy, and (sigh) Ant-Man. Said posters can be seen right here: http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/marvels-phase-two-revealed-at-comic-con
As for titles and releases dates:
Thor: The Dark World November 8, 2013
Captain America: The Winter Solider April 4, 2014
Iron Man 3 May 3, 2013
Guardians of the Galaxy August 1, 2014
Ant-Man TBD
Now I'm all for sequels for Thor and Captain America and Iron Man. They were all great films and what with the success of The Avengers (even though I thought it was overrated) you know a sequel to this box office hit is in the works. However, I've never even heard of Guardians of the Galaxy and I have a suspicion it could be a titanic flop. And Ant-Man? Really? Look I know that Ant-Man was part of The Avengers and Edgar Wright (Hot Fuzz, Shaun of the Dead) is a fantastic director but COME ON! Is anyone really clamoring to see Ant-Man? He doesn't need his own story. If you want to put him in The Avengers 2 fine but don't give him his own movie.
What's next Beaver Girl? On second thought they may not be able to show that one in theaters.
Jonah Hill to have a super bad role in "Django Unchained"
"The 'D' is silent."
Other than The Dark Knight Rises and The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey my most anticipated film for the remainder of 2012 has to be Tarantino's upcoming Django Unchained.
As some of you may or may not know Jonah Hill (who is apparently in every film now) was once attached to the film and then left. Well now he's back and we finally know what his role will be in Django Unchained.
"Entertainment Weekly" writes that Hill will be playing a member a of Ku Klux Klan-esque group called "The Regulators"* although Tarantino did not reveal Hill's character's name. Who are "The Regulators" you ask? Tarantino states they are:
“a group of people who kept slaves in line, found them if they escaped, and terrorized them.” The scene features a Regulator raid against Foxx and Waltz’s bounty hunters. “It starts off like it’s going to be very scary,” explained Tarantino, “And then they have this sequence that’s one of the funniest things I’ve ever written. Right up there with handing out the color names in Reservoir Dogs.”
Although I'm not the biggest Jonah Hill fan in the world I respect the fact that he wants to do movies outside of his comfort zone. Playing a character who is part of a KKK like group of people is definitely well outside of said zone. I think the last thing he wants to be is a Chris Farley retread. Hill's role in Moneyball was very impressive and he's set to begin filming on Martin Scorcese's The Wolf of Wall Street next month. Tarantino and Scorcese, two directors that know talent when they see it, so let's just say I trust their judgement.
Django Unchained releases Christmas Day this year.
*Whenever I hear the world "regulators" I think of one of three things:
1--"Regulators mount up!" from Young Guns
2--The 90s rap song by Nate Dogg that quotes from Young Guns. I remember one line in particular that goes, "15 in the clip and one in the hole Nate Dogg is about to make some bodies turn cold. They're dropping and their yellin' but they're a tad bit late. Old Nate Dogg had to regulate."
3--The novel "The Regulators" by Stephen King
Peter Jackson just can't abandon Middle Earth....
To anyone who knows Peter Jackson and his affiliation with Middle Earth, he has a slight problem letting go. In all the three of The Lord of the Rings pictures, he shot extra footage after the movie came out for the extended cuts of the films. (And yes I bought both.) In fact he has the distinction of being the only director ever to add footage to a film that had already won the Academy Award for Best Picture (The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.)
That's why the following news from "Omelete" and "Collider" comes as no shock to me. This week at Comic-Con* Peter Jackson stated he probably will shoot extra footage for The Hobbit films. However, he wasn't definitive on the time frame. After all he has some massive hours to spend in the cutting room before the first film debuts in December. Because of Jackson's Hollywood pull and the success of the Extended Cuts of his previous ventures into Middle Earth, the chances are probably 99.999% that these follow-up shoots are going to happen.
Then Jackson dropped a bomb shell.
Peter told the panel that the extra footage would either be used to 1) extend the cut of the two films either in theaters or later on DVD and Blu-Ray or 2) a THIRD PART ENTIRELY.
Whhaaaa?? Whaaaa?
Does this mean The Hobbit will be split into three parts instead of two? I sincerely hope not because the word "overkill" comes to mind. After all we are talking about a book that's only about 350 pages long. I'm just as excited as anyone else to see the extra parts that Jackson puts in the movie that were only hinted at in Tolkien's books, however there is such a thing as too much of a good thing. I don't want the story to be dragged away from Bilbo. This is essentially Bilbo Baggins' (Martin Freeman) story. The focus needs to be on him.
The Hobbit: A Unexpected Journey opens December 14, 2012
The Hobbit: There and Back Again opens December 13, 2013
*I would absolutely love to go to Comic-Con some day but there's no way I'd ever dress up.....or would I?
That's why the following news from "Omelete" and "Collider" comes as no shock to me. This week at Comic-Con* Peter Jackson stated he probably will shoot extra footage for The Hobbit films. However, he wasn't definitive on the time frame. After all he has some massive hours to spend in the cutting room before the first film debuts in December. Because of Jackson's Hollywood pull and the success of the Extended Cuts of his previous ventures into Middle Earth, the chances are probably 99.999% that these follow-up shoots are going to happen.
Then Jackson dropped a bomb shell.
Peter told the panel that the extra footage would either be used to 1) extend the cut of the two films either in theaters or later on DVD and Blu-Ray or 2) a THIRD PART ENTIRELY.
Whhaaaa?? Whaaaa?
Does this mean The Hobbit will be split into three parts instead of two? I sincerely hope not because the word "overkill" comes to mind. After all we are talking about a book that's only about 350 pages long. I'm just as excited as anyone else to see the extra parts that Jackson puts in the movie that were only hinted at in Tolkien's books, however there is such a thing as too much of a good thing. I don't want the story to be dragged away from Bilbo. This is essentially Bilbo Baggins' (Martin Freeman) story. The focus needs to be on him.
The Hobbit: A Unexpected Journey opens December 14, 2012
The Hobbit: There and Back Again opens December 13, 2013
*I would absolutely love to go to Comic-Con some day but there's no way I'd ever dress up.....or would I?
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
No 3D IMAX post conversion for "Man of Steel"
Maybe I just assumed this but I totally thought that next year's Man of Steel was being shot in IMAX 3D. Apparently I was not only wrong but there are no plans to post convert Man of Steel* into an IMAX 3D experience either according to Warner Bros.
Personally I call bullshit on this one and I don't care that the source is Warner Bros. There's plenty of time to do a post production 3D IMAX conversion and I highly doubt that Warner Bros. would leave potentially millions of dollars in box office receipts sitting on the table.
In a bit of good news however, Warner Bros. did release a new plot synopsis for Man of Steel:
In the pantheon of superheroes, Superman is the most recognized and revered character of all time. Clark Kent/Kal-El (Henry Cavill) is a young twenty-something journalist who feels alienated by powers beyond his imagination. Transported years ago to Earth from Krypton, a highly advanced, distant planet, Clark struggles with the ultimate question 'Why am I here?' Shaped by the values of his adoptive parents Martha (Diane Lane) and Jonathan Kent (Kevin Costner), Clark discovers having extraordinary abilities means making difficult decisions. When the world is in dire need of stability, an even greater threat emerges. Clark must become a Man of Steel, to protect the people he loves and shine as the world's beacon of hope - Superman.
That's still a little vague I guess but a lot more than we've had before. Personally I think Henry Cavill** (The Tudors) is an excellent actor and will make for a spectacular Superman. He can't be worse than Brandon Routh.***
Man of Steel opens June 14, 2013
*Sincerely hoping there will be at least a teaser trailer for this movie before The Dark Knight Rises.
**How in the name of God did Cavill get into that suit?! It looks painted on!
***There's a great part at the end of the movie Ted where they make reference to Routh and the awful Superman Returns, that is freakin' hilarious.
Claws out people! The Wolverine picks up steam with several casting announcments
With The Wolverine only a few weeks away from principal photography, many were beginning to wonder when we'd actually hear some casting announcements other than Hugh Jackman. Well ask and ye shall receive!
"Coming Soon" and "Variety" reports several major casting announcements regarding director James Mangold's upcoming sequel. Since the film centers exclusively on the popular Japanese* comic storyline from Chris Claremont and Frank Miller, many of these people you may have never heard of. Since there are so many I'll list them off:
Hiroyuki Sanada ("Lost" and The Last Samauri) will play Shingen.
Hal Yamanouchi (The Life Aquatic) will play Yashida.
Tao Okamoto and Rila Fukushima will play Mariko and Yukio respectively.
Will Yun Lee (Total Recall) will play the film's main villain Kenuichio Harada, also known as the "Silver Samurai."
If you know who none of these characters or people are don't be alarmed because I don't either. Although I've always liked "The X-Men" and Wolverine especially, I've never really followed the comicbooks. However with the cast, source material, and director involved in this project, I have a lot of confidence that this will be a powerhouse movie. It certainly can't be worse than X-Men Origins: Wolverine.
The Wolverine releases July 26, 2013.
*The real question is will there be a part for Yoshi from the Super Mario Bros. games in this movie? I kid. I kid.
Boom goes the alien explosions! Independence Day 2 may soon be making its way to a theater near you...
I've always wondered why a big box office success like 1996's Independence Day never received a sequel. Granted the aliens (spoiler alert!) are vanquished at the end of the film, however when has a little thing like fact ever stopped a Hollywood studio from making money? Well 16 years after the release of the first film, audiences may soon be getting a second dose of alien destruction.
According to "The Hollywood Reporter," Dean Devlin who wrote and produced ID4, and director Roland Emmerich are re-teaming to try and make a sequel happen. However, Devlin does hedge his bets a little telling "The Hollywood Reporter," "Whether or not we can make this happen, if we can get all the pieces to come together, that's gonna be challenging. But creatively, for the very first time since we did the original, I feel we have a worthy concept, a worthy path to go."
ID4 was huge catapult for both Devlin and Emmerich's careers. Devlin went on to develop the successful show "Leverage" and Emmerich of course has gone the big budget route with films like The Day After Tomorrow and 2012. Obviously this is a passion project for both men and something they feel very strongly about.
While I loved ID4 when it came out it doesn't hold up very well a decade and a half later. Furthermore is anyone really clamouring for a sequel at this point?* Next summer might prove to be a good litmus test however. Fox recently announced that they will be re-releasing ID4 on July 3rd in 3D. (Natch!) Audience response might determine if a sequel actually gets greenlit.
*There's no way a sequel is going to work without the original cast I might add.
Hannibal Lecter to serve up some fava beans on Darren Aronofsky's "Noah"
Ok so take this with a huge grain of salt because the source comes via Twitter.
According to director Darren Aronofsky's Twitter page, the Requiem for a Dream director just announced that Sir Anthony Hopkins will be joining the cast of Noah. Hopkins will play the role of Methuselah, the oldest person ever recorded in the Hebrew Bible at 969. This is slightly older than Hopkins real age of 74 but I think he can pull it off.
Hopkins joins an already stellar cast that includes Russell Crowe, Emma Watson, Logan Lerman, Jennifer Connelly, and Ray Winstone.
Noah's release date is set for March 28, 2014.
Fairport native Philip Seymour Hoffman accepts role in "Catching Fire"
Couldn't be more pleased with this news.
Production company Lionsgate just announced that Fairport native Philip Seymour Hoffman has accepted a role in The Hunger Games: Catching Fire. Hoffman will play Head Gamemaker Plutarch Heavensbee who as fans of the book know is not exactly what he appears to be.
I'm definitely one of those people who believes in the law of attraction. You attract what you consistently put out into the world. Likewise if you have good source material for a script you'll attract talent to make that story come alive. Hoffman certainly fits that mold as he's already been nominated for Academy Awards numerous times and won an Oscar for Capote.
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire begins filming late next month with a release date set for November 22, 2013. Hoffman can next be seen in Paul Thomas Anderson's film The Master.
Fassbender to head up Assassin's Creed movie??
As a general rule I'm never too enthusiastic about video games that are converted into movies. However, considering the vast leaps video games have made in the last decade, the increasingly intricate stories, and the high profile actors who often lend their voices to the games, I've found that sometimes videogames have better storylines than movies. (The last two Batman games "Arkham Asylum" and "Arkham City" would have made fantastic films.)
Well it seems some studios may agree with me as it looks like the video game "Assassin's Creed"* will soon get the big screen treatment. I won't go into detail about the nature of "Assassin's Creed" as I've never played the game. Google it if you want to. Suffice it to say that it involves a brotherhood of assassins throughout history and various killings. Oh and a creed.
And lo and behold the studios will actually cast an excellent actor in the lead role.
According to "Variety" Michael Fassbender** plans to star and produce in the upcoming adaptation. Fassbender will work in conjunction with his newly formed production company DMC Film, alongside videogame company Ubisoft who make and distribute "Assassin's Creed."
I actually have high hopes for this film and the storyline is quite complex. The fact that Michael Fassbender is on board is only icing on the cake.
Assassin's Creed is still in the early negotiation stages and Fassbender has not officially signed as of yet. My guess is that if this movie goes through it will definitely be a summer tent pole movie. If all goes smoothly I'm expecting summer 2014.
*The next Assassin's Creed video game releases this fall.
**I'm still marveling at the amazing performance Fassbender put on as David the android in Ridley Scott's Prometheus.
Monday, July 9, 2012
A Caped Crusader Twitter Bonanza!!!!
Despite the fact that my wife considers me completely insane for doing this, on July 19th I plan on attending a "Dark Knight" marathon at Regal Cinemas 18. Batman Begins starts at 630PM, followed by The Dark Knight, and finally at midnight The Dark Knight Rises*.
Hello sore assville. (Hmmm maybe I should have worded that better.)
Anyway since I'm a huge fan of Batman and a movie blogger, I thought I'd Twitter about my experience that evening. My tweets can be read @cocook1978 or you can follow them on Facebook as well. Hope you enjoy!
*I'm planning on taking my wife to see the film on IMAX too. Should be epic.
DVD and Blu Ray releases for July 10th
Here are the DVD and Blu Ray releases for July 10th:
American Reunion, The Three Stooges, Being Flynn, The Flowers of War, Margaret, Bitch Slap*, Chariots of Fire*, Spawn*, Blade II*, Altered States*, The Astronaut's Wife*, Frequency*, The Saphead, Twins of Evil*, Dark Shadows: The Complete Series**, The Big Bang Theory Season 1*, The Big Bang Theory Season 2*, Adventure Time**, The Glades Season 2**, Warehouse 13 Season 3**
*Only releasing in Blu-Ray format
**Only releasing in DVD format
American Reunion, The Three Stooges, Being Flynn, The Flowers of War, Margaret, Bitch Slap*, Chariots of Fire*, Spawn*, Blade II*, Altered States*, The Astronaut's Wife*, Frequency*, The Saphead, Twins of Evil*, Dark Shadows: The Complete Series**, The Big Bang Theory Season 1*, The Big Bang Theory Season 2*, Adventure Time**, The Glades Season 2**, Warehouse 13 Season 3**
*Only releasing in Blu-Ray format
**Only releasing in DVD format
RIP Ernest Borgnine
On Sunday the world lost an acting legend, as Oscar winner Ernest Borgnine passed away at the age of 95.
For those of you who only know Borgnine as the voice of Mermaid Man from "Spongebob Squarepants," I feel a little sorry for you as Borgnine was so much more than a voice on a kid's cartoon.
In over six decades of work beginning in 1951, Borgnine managed to appear in a movie, television film, or television series almost every single year. (In fact Borgnine actually has another film coming out this year.) He was a veteran of classic films like The Dirty Dozen, The Flight of the Phoenix, The Poseidon Adventure. Never one to play it safe, Borgnine even appeared in unlikely films like John Carpenter's Escape from New York and Matt Parker and Trey Stone's (yes the creators of "South Park") BaseKetball.
Furthermore, Borgnine also appeared in two classic television shows separated by two decades. From 1962 to 1966 he played the lead role of Lt. Commander Quinton McHale in "McHale's Navy." From 1984 to 1987 he played opposite Jan Michael-Vincent as Dominic Santini in the classic 80s action drama "Airwolf." He was even nominated for a guest appearance Emmy award for a two episode arc on "ER."
While Borgnine is probably most noted for his Oscar winning turn as Marty Piletti in the 1955 film Marty, I'll always remember Borgnine for his role as Dutch in director Sam Peckinpah's classic 1969 Western The Wild Bunch.
I'd like to end this post with an interesting anecdote I heard about Borgnine the other day. Although he knew and was friendly with John Wayne for years, they never had a chance to work together. One day the two ran into each other and Wayne asked, "Ernie why the hell have you and I never gotten the chance to work together?" Quick as you please Borgnine responded back with "Because you never work with good actors." Wayne collapsed into spasms of laughter. But Borgnine was wrong in his assessment. He wasn't a good actor.
He was a great actor.
Rest in peace Ernest Borgnine.
Review: The Amazing Spiderman
Plot: The "untold" story of the webslinging superhero, The Amazing Spiderman follows the origin story of Peter Parker/Spiderman (Andrew Garfield). When his parents die in a tragic plane crash, relatives Uncle Ben (Martin Sheen) and Aunt May (Sally Field) raise the introverted but extremely intelligent Peter. An awkward high school loner, Peter pines after the beautiful and talented Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone) and struggles to fit in. One day Peter discovers his father's briefcase which eventually leads him to his father's old company Oscorp, his father's friend and former partner Dr. Curt Connors (Rhys Ifans), and an encounter with a spider that will change his destiny forever.
Review: Although Spiderman 3 was an epic failure critically, most fans didn't expect a complete reboot of the franchise just five short years after the last incarnation. I know I certainly wasn't. But when there are gobs of money to be made, no studio will turn down a sure fire cash cow like Spiderman. And with global box office receipts climbing towards $350 million in just just seven days, that assessment is certainly justified.
But is The Amazing Spiderman a good movie?
While it is certainly better than its predecessor, the latest rebooted installment of Spidey is merely an average film. On paper The Amazing Spiderman seems like it has all the right ingredients: two up and coming talented young actors, a solid villain, a darker edgier tone, and great special effects. And don't get me wrong all of those things exist within this film. However, throughout The Amazing Spiderman it contains no bite, no substance, and lacks an essential quality that kept me from connecting with this movie. Call it the "it factor." It's as good a name as any because I can't assign a specific name to it.
Director Marc Webb's take on the Marvel superhero is definitely darker, with a more intense sense of realism, ala Christopher Nolan in Batman Begins and The Dark Knight. However, The Amazing Spiderman is a pale imitation of what Nolan has previously created. Webb's film unfortunately comes across as trying to be too much like Nolan's movies. It's often strained and lacks a definitive tone or focus. This is tragic when you consider the fact that James Vanderbilt, Alvin Sargent, and Steve Kloves's script is actually quite good. One wonders how another director might have handled their screenplay. At two hours and sixteen minutes, The Amazing Spiderman also suffers an overly long run time. Trimming the film by fifteen to twenty minutes might have done wonders.
As for the acting, Andrew Garfield is head and shoulders above Tobey MacGuire as Peter Parker/Spiderman. Garfield's portrayal of the vaunted webslinger is much more nuanced and emotional. He's a loner who still feels a sense of abandonment by his parents. Garfield's Parker is awkward and shy at first; you can see his struggles with acceptance in school and in trying to attract his first love Gwen Stacy. I actually found some of the scenes between Garfield, Martin Sheen, and Aunt May to be more interesting than some of the action sequences.
I had high expectations for Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy but unfortunately she fell flat for me. The chemistry was severely lacking between her and Garfield and I felt no real emotional connection to her character. Though Garfield tries his best I couldn't bring myself to care about the plight of these two lovers.
On the plus side Rhys Ifans makes for a fantastic Dr. Curt Connors/Lizard. This is the villain Spidey fans have been begging for for years. Their patience was well worth the wait as Ifans excels in this role. There is a real pathos about his character. He's someone with mixed motivations. On the one hand he ostensibly wants to eliminate genetic defects but deep down Connors also desires to regrow the arm he lost in a fatal accident years ago. Things are further complicated by pressure from his boss, Norman Osbourne, who is apparently dying and needs Connors' science to work. As Ifans descends further into the role of The Lizard, a distinct Frankenstein's monster-esque quality begins to emerge. This in turn makes Ifans maybe the most sympathetic and relatable character in the whole film.
For viewers expecting visual wonders there are plenty in The Amazing Spiderman. From Spidey's initial rooftop webslinging, to an impressive rescue on the Brooklynn Bridge, to the final climactic confrontation with The Lizard, The Amazing Spiderman abounds with raw visual intensity that's sure to please fans and non-fans of the arachnid superhero.
I wanted to like The Amazing Spiderman. I really did. Yet as I've said there was an essence, a substance that just wasn't there. The film didn't resonate fully like I expected it to. Underneath the glitz and glamor of the Spiderman mask there was nothing but an empty shell. Perhaps a second viewing might change my mind but I'm not hopeful. At the end of the day The Amazing Spiderman proves to be nothing more than a mildly entertaining summer popcorn flick.
My rating: 7/10
Review: Ted
Plot: On Christmas Day 1985 lonely and friendless eight year old John Bennett (Mark Wahlberg) wishes for his teddy bear to come alive. Miraculously it does and for 27 years through celebrity appearances, drug busts, multiple jobs, and plenty of pot induced viewings of Flash Gordon, Ted (voiced by Seth Macfarlane) and John stay the best of friends. However, John's longtime girlfriend Lori (Mila Kunis) becomes increasingly disenchanted with John and Ted's inability to grow up and become more responsible. Eventually John realizes he may have to choose between his best friend and the love of his life.
Review: I can't begin to overstate how hilarious, how laugh-out-loud funny, how incredibly entertaining director Seth Macfarlane's debut film Ted is. It's easily the funniest film I've seen since The Hangover and maybe one of the funniest ever.
Many naysayers were weary that MacFarlane bit off more than he could chew. Not only did he star in and direct Ted but he also wrote co-wrote the script and co-produced the movie. Taking on that many hats can often be a recipe for disaster. In this case it is a recipe for hilarity and if this is the type of comedy we can expect from Mr. MacFarlane going forward, the world will be better for it.
Obviously one of the key components of any film involves the suspension of disbelief which, when it comes to a talking teddy bear, can be quite difficult. In Ted John's parents and the rest of the world react with disbelief, fear, and amazement. Ted becomes instantly famous and appears on magazines and the Johnny Carson show. Eventually however the novelty wears off and as Patrick Stewart (who narrates the film) says, "But like the careers of Corey Haim and Corey Feldman eventually no one gives a shit." Not only does this reflect perfectly the attitude of society in the late 20th/early 21st century, it makes the suspension of disbelief that much easier to bear. (Pun definitely intended!)
And the funny aspects of the film? Let's see. There is a coked out Sam J. Jones (the star of 1980's Flash Gordon and a huge influence on John and Ted's lives) partying with Ted and John. The relationship between Ted and his white trash Boston girlfriend Tammy-Lynn make for plenty of hilarious moments. Joel McHale plays Rex, a hilarious rival to John as Lori's boss, and the interaction between John and Rex makes for one of the funniest one liners I've ever heard before. In fact there are so many one liners, inappropriate comedy, Snuggles the Bear and Teddy Ruxpin jokes, and hilarious moments that I don't want to reveal too much lest it ruin the film for others. Suffice it to say that MacFarlane's script is spot on. There's even a part for an uber-creepy Giovanni Ribisi who wants to buy Ted.
I'd also be remiss if I didn't mention the fantastic chemistry between Wahlberg, Kunis, and MacFarlane. All three are at the top of their game and the three way dynamic is awesome. The love shared between John and Lori is just as palpable and believable as the love and friendship between Ted and John. And wonder of wonders Mark Wahlberg (often known for his action roles) manages to be incredibly funny in this film.
In my opinion Ted will eventually become a cult classic comedy like Fletch. It's definitely a movie that bears rewatching if for no other reason than I was laughing so hard sometimes that I missed jokes. Even if you're not a "Family Guy" fan I dare you to not leave the theater with side splitting pains in your gut.
My rating: 9/10
Thursday, July 5, 2012
Review: Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter
Plot: Based on the novel by Seth Grahame-Smith, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter supposes that our 16th president (played by Benjamin Walker) was a secret stalker of the undead ever since witnessing the death of his mother at a young age. Consumed by thoughts of revenge, Lincoln is saved from a near fatal mistake by friend and mentor Henry (Dominic Cooper) who decides to take Abe under his wing and teach him the ins and outs of vampire slaying. As time progresses, Lincoln eventually puts away the axe, moves on to a political career, and marries Mary Todd (Mary Elizabeth Winstead). However, when Henry discovers that ancient vampire Adam (Rufus Sewell) is behind the American Civil War and whose ultimate aim is to finally create a nation for vampires, it's up to Abe and a close band of cohorts to determine the fate of the nation.
Review: Let's get one thing clear, Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter by it's very name is not a film steeped in historical accuracy. That's why I am befuddled by people chastising this film and forwarding the ridiculous idea that kids will grow up believing Honest Abe slew vampires. Memo to all parents out there: if your child actually grows up believing that Abraham Lincoln's main accomplishments involved dispatching the undead, YOU HAVE FAILED AS A PARENT.
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter's* main purpose isn't to provide a history lesson, it's to entertain, and as a horror/action/pseudo-biopic genre mash up, the film is mostly entertaining although nowhere near as good as Grahame-Smith's novel.
Director Timur Bekmambetov (Wanted) helms ALVH and chooses (for the most part) a very straight edged vision for the film. The tongue is not firmly in cheek throughout the movie and at no point does ALVH come across as a comedy. Bekmambetov's trademark slow motion scenes and gory action sequences inundate the entire film, providing plenty of high octane adrenaline rushes. Unfortunately, sometimes Bekmambetov's pacing comes across choppy, and too often ALVH jumps from one action sequence to the next with barely any room for a breath.
Additionally, I thought the representation of vampires within the film was shoddy at best. Maybe it's just a personal preference, but it drives me crazy when I see vampires on screen whose faces and jaws become all distended and twisted when they vamp out. I much prefer the traditional straight fangs. Moreover, the face distortion is symptomatic of the terrible CGI in this picture. For a movie that had a $70 million dollar budget, you'd think Fox could have cleaned things up a bit. One sequence in particular (where Abe chases a vampire across a stampede of horses) looks like Elmo from Sesame Street put it together. I will concede however that the final vampire battle/train sequence was quite entertaining.
Fortunately, ALVH redeems itself partly through it's acting. That's right I said acting. Most people wouldn't expect quality acting in a film with this title, but it's actually quite good. Sewell exceeds at playing the despicable Adam, although to be fair he's always good at playing a villain. Benjamin Walker, who previously appeared in the quality dramas Flags of our Fathers and Kinsey, pulls off a surprisingly believable and heartfelt depiction of our 16th president. Walker fully commits to the role** not just at the supernatural level but also as a President struggling with a country being torn apart by slavery. Mary Elizabeth Winstead does well as Mary Todd although she's a little too young and pretty to fit the role. For my money Dominic Cooper steals the show as Henry Sturgess. Henry is a very complex character, a vampire who wishes to revenge himself upon the same creatures that destroyed his family. Cooper does an excellent job of bringing those experiences to the forefront of Henry's personality. Despite being a vampire, Henry's someone the audience can connect to.
It's a reader's burden always to lament the fact that the movie is never as good as the book and ALVH is no different. However what's even more egregious is that the screenwriter is also the book's author. While most of the plot remains intact, the ending (which is much better in the novel) has been completely changed. It reeks of studio strong-arming because I can't believe that Mr. Grahame-Smith would willingly consent to such a hatchet job.
The bottom line is that if you want a history lesson on Lincoln grab an encyclopedia and go to town. If you want two hours of mindless violence, action, and vampire ass kicking then Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter is right up your alley.
My rating: 6/10
*Trust me read the novel. It is amazing.
**As good as Walker was in this movie I'm guessing Daniel Day-Lewis' portrayal of Lincoln in the upcoming biopic (sans vampires) is going to be slightly better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)