Thursday, September 27, 2012
From Harry Potter to Igor?
In an effort to break away from the stigma of Harry Potter, actor Daniel Radcliffe continues to pursue roles as far from wizarding as possible. First there was his naked ride on a horse in the play "Equs," then there was his lead role in The Woman in Black, and most recently a resoundingly successful run on Broadway in "How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying."
What's up next for the poster boy of House Gryffindor? How about Frankenstein?
Courtesy of "The Wrap," Radcliffe is apparently interested in a role in the latest adaptation of Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein."* Reports indicate he wants to play The Hunchback, a "pathologically dirty man dressed in old clowns clothing." Hmmm. Definitely a 180 from wizard's robes.
Director Paul McGuigan recently stepped in to helm the project after Shawn Levy dropped out. Max Landis, who scripted the surprise hit Chronicle, also took over screenwriting duties. Landis' describes his version as a "sci-fi take on this classic story about a creature produced through a scientific experiment." As a English Lit major I have to point out that Landis' description is redundant. "Frankenstein" is science fiction, some of the earliest ever written. It also encompasses Gothic horror, the concept of the sublime, and is a great example of a framed narrative. Okay. I just took off my tweed coat with the elbow patches and stepped away from the lectern. You may sit down now.
I have to give Radcliffe credit. He's taking every chance available to step out of the shadow of Harry Potter. The child actor to adult actor transition is never easy and often doesn't end well. It's too soon to tell whether Radcliffe's story will reflect Kurt Russell and Joseph Gordon-Levitt or Haley Joel Osmet and Macaulay Culkin.
*1994's version of Frankenstein starring Kenneth Branagh and Robert DeNiro is severely underrated.
No wrench in Rinsch's editing room; Universal says the "47 Ronin" director is still in charge
See what I did there? Rinsch. Wrench. I--ah nevermind.
Recent reports claimed that the director of the upcoming samurai epic 47 Ronin, Carl Rinsch,* had lost control of the production after the budget ballooned from $175 million to $225 million. An inside source claimed that the director "buckled under the pressure of the ambitious shoot." In an effort to dispel rumors, Universal pictures came to the defense of the young director, telling "Deadline" that the reports are patently false. Although the studio is taking a more active role in the editing process, Rinsch is also actively editing 47 Ronin** which stars Keanu Reeves***. Additionally, Universal states the budget is still under $200 million.
As "R.E.M" might say "What's the frequency Kenneth?" What's the real story? Like most things it probably lies somewhere in the middle. I can't for one second believe that a studio would completely lock a director completely out of the editing room. At the same time for a first time director whose previous works included only commercials and short films, you can bank on the studio tightening the reins. Especially with a $200 million budget.
47 Ronin releases December 25, 2013.
*Rinsch was originally slated to direct the Alien prequel until Ridley Scott took over and it became Prometheus.
**The release date of this film has already changed twice. At this rate we are probably going to get the third Bill and Ted movie first.
***I'm sorry I just can't see Reeves as a samurai and I have a feeling this movie is going to bomb worse than John Carter.
"Donnie Darko" director Richard Kelly and Nic Cage team up for true crime story "Amicus"
It's been a long time since I've seen a Nicholas Cage movie I actually liked**. The man isn't very discriminating when it comes to scripts. By that mean if there are actual words on a page and the storyline involves him sporting a ridiculous hair style, typically he'll jump on it. The guy is kind of a wack job. How else do you explain it? In the course of twenty years Cage went from making classics like Raising Arizona and Leaving Las Vegas to Drive Angry and Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance. And the guy named his son Kal-El. (That's right the Kryptonian name of Clark Kent aka Superman. I'm not joking.)
But I digress.
In any case Cage is set to team up with Richard Kelly, director of cult classic Donnie Darko in the crime thriller Amicus. Check out the plot:
spanning 25 years, [AMICUS] is based on the true story of
Lawrence Horn, a former record producer and Motown Records exec who is currently
serving a life sentence in prison for hiring Detroit-based hit man James Perry
to murder his wife, quadriplegic son and the wealthy family's overnight nurse at
their suburban home in Silver Spring, Maryland. Horn's son was the victim of
medical malpractice and as the result of a subsequent lawsuit, had a trust worth
nearly $2 million, which his father stood to inherit in the wake of his death.
Detectives discovered that Perry, who was sentenced to death in 1995 for the
brutal crime, used how-to book "Hit Man: A Technical Manual for Independent
Contractors" as a guide to execute the murders. The families of the victims went
on to file a class-action lawsuit against the Colorado-based publisher Paladin
Press. The attorneys representing the families then hired Smolla, a First
Amendment attorney and professor at William & Mary Law School, to consult on
the historic case, which took five years to settle amidst a series of shocking
and bizarre developments.
Cage is set to play Smolla. No other casting announcements yet but according to "Variety" the film starts shooting in June so expect more news in the near future.
*I'm sorry but I couldn't resist putting not one but two crazy pictures of Nic Cage up.
**I take that back. 2006's World Trade Center was actually really good.
Realms galore to look forward to in the sequel to Thor
By no means am I going to sit here and say that I'm versed in Norse mythology. Far from it. Yes I knew the basic gods like Thor, Odin, and Loki before I saw the 2011 film Thor but beyond that you might as well ask me to name the likes and dislikes of the cast of "The Jersey Shore." Translation: I could have cared less.
Well if you are a fan of the Norse god, you may be interested to know that viewers will be exposed to more realms than just Asgard, Midgard (Earth), and Jotunheim (home of the Frost Giants). A lot more. As in all of them.
"Kinopoisk," a Russian paper, reports that all nine realms of the Thor universe will appear in next year's sequel. They are:
1. Asgard (Home of the Gods)
2. Midgard (Earth)
3. Jotunheim (Home of the Frost Giants)
4. Svartalfheim (Home of the Dark Elves)
5. Alfheim (Home of the Light Elves)
6. Nidavellir (Home of the Dwarves)
7. Vanaheim (an associate God realm)
8. Hel/Niffleheim (Realm of the Dead/Frozen Realm of the Dishonored Dead)
9. Muspelheim (Home of the Fire Demons)
It's a good thing I'm writing this post and not saying it out loud because my tongue just fell out of my mouth. Also my spell check just committed suicide.
The whole Thor universe seems a little dense to me. It reflects more Middle Earth than Marvel. Then again I'm always down for Elves, Dwarves, and Fire Demons. I just hope that with nine realms, director Alan Taylor* can traverse the waters without the film becoming too dense to navigate through.
Thor: The Dark World is currently filming in England and will release November 8th of next year.
*Taylor directed several episodes of the first two seasons of Game of Thrones so I have a lot of confidence in this film.
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
A double dose of Professor X in "X-Men: Days of Future Past"?
Now this I could definitely get on board with!
While I think Patrick Stewart is simply amazing as Professor X in the X-Men films, I also think James McAvoy was equally impressive as the younger version of the titular head of the X-Men. And now it seems audiences will be treated to not one but two helpings of Professor X. (X squared?)
At a recent discussion panel at the Montreal Comic Con, when Stewart was asked about appearing in the followup to 2011's X-Men: First Class Stewart replied, "I think there is every possibility." Now granted while this is certainly not a definitive "yes" the remark is interesting in light of the sequel's plot:
The storyline alternates between present day, in which the X-Men fight Mystique's Brotherhood of Evil Mutants, and a future timeline caused by the X-Men's failure to prevent the Brotherhood from assassinating Senator Robert Kelly. In this future universe, Sentinels rule the United States, and mutants live in internment camps. The present-day X-Men are forewarned of the possible future by a future version of their teammate Kitty Pryde, whose mind traveled back in time and possessed her younger self to warn the X-Men. She succeeds in her mission and returns to the future, but despite her success, the future timeline still exists as an alternative timeline rather than as the actual future.
Anytime there is a time travel storyline to a film, anything is up for grabs which tells me that barring a major catastrophe, Stewart will be in this film. If Stewart does appear this brings up another interesting thought: would Ian McKellen appear in the film as the older Magneto? Oh the possibilites!
X-Men: Days of Future Past opens July 18, 2014.
Quentin Tarantino's next and will he make a cameo in "Django Unchained"
If you want a dynamite dialogue wordsmith go with Quentin Tarantino. The guy is an absolute Zen master. Every single film he comes out with I just quiver with anticipation. I have no doubt December 25th's Django Unchained is going to be epic.
Never one to stay focused for very long, Tarantino's creative juices may have already moved on to the next project. Well maybe not exactly the "what" of the project but definitely the "where."
"IndieWire" reports that Django Unchained actor John Jarratt and Tarantino are in talks to film his next movie in Australia. Hmm. A wide, sweeping, and exotic country to go along with a man whose imagination is wider than the whole continent? Yeah I could see that.
Additionally, "IndieWire" also reports what has long been suspected that yes, Tarantino will be making a cameo appearance in Django Unchained. More than likely he will be playing one of the Regulators, a group of people who "kept slaves in line, found them if they escaped, and terrorized them." Despite the fact that Tarantino is a terrible actor I never minded his cameos in Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown. While they paled in comparison to the amazing acting talent around him, they certainly did not detract from the film.
The scenes in question will have Tarantino opposite actors Don Johnson and Jonah Hill. Actor Rex Linn reports that "The scenes may not be long, but you will remember them." Short and sweet. Nice.
Django Unchained escapes into theaters Christmas Day.
Does the new still of Evangeline Lily as the elf Tauriel provide a clue as to where "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" will end?
I have to say ever since "Lost" ended I kind of feel like Christopher Walken on SNL. "Guess what?! I've got a fever! And the only prescription is more cowbell!" Except in this case cowbell means Evangeline Lily. While she's been in a few things (The Hurt Locker, Reel Steel) the woman who played Kate on maybe the best show of the last 20 years has been mostly off the radar.
That's likely to change very shortly as Lily can be seen in this December's The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey as the elf Tauriel. Although Lily states that her role is very small in the first film, she will get much more time in the second and third movies. However, despite the fact that I'm captivated by the idea of Lily starring as a hot elf, it did get me thinking about where exactly The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is going to end.
While Tauriel is not a creation of Tolkien she is an elf of Mirkwood. Consequently, if we believe Lily about her role in the film, this suggests that (spoiler alert!) the first film will not end until the dwarves and Bilbo are captured by the elves of the woodland realm. Although it is always possible that she shows up in Rivendell earlier in the film. Right now it's just speculation. On that note here's another picture of Evangeline Lily:
You're welcome.
Fox has a short list of directors to helm the sequel to "Rise of the Planet of the Apes"
Last year's Rise of the Planet of the Apes was easily the surprise hit of 2011. No one expected a movie about humanoid apes at the tail end of the summer movie season to have any succes commercially or critically. And after the absolute abortion that was director Tim Burton's 2001 remake, why would anyone expect the film to be good? Just goes to show that producer William Goldman's old Hollywood saw is correct: "Nobody knows nothin'." With a budget of $93 million the film went on to rake in almost half a billion dollars worldwide and thanks to a strong script, excellent performances, and amazing motion capture shots, it currently holds a 83% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
And just like another Hollywood axiom (if it makes money it's getting a sequel) the follow up to Apes will soon hit the theaters. Unfortunately director Rupert Wyatt will not be along for the second go around, claiming concerns about the hard release date already set for the film. Yet the beat goes on and Fox Studios already has a short list of directors in mind to helm the second film in what will inevitably be a trilogy.
Fox Studios has narrowed down its directors list to the following candidates:
Rian Johnson (Looper)
Guillermo Del Toro (Hellboy, Pan's Labryinth)
Matt Reeves (Cloverfield)
Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (28 Weeks Later*)
J. Blakeson (The Disappearnce of Alice Creed)
Jeff Nichols (Take Shelter)
Juane Antonio Bayona (The Orphanage)
While these are all great choices (minus Matt Reed) I think Fox has to go with either Del Toro or Fresnadillo. Del Toro already has a proven track record in dealing with the bizarre and is probably one of the more underrated directors working today. Fresnadillo on the other hand has an excellent grasp of the thriller/horror genre and would be a great fit.
The sequel, entitled Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, swings into theaters May 23rd, 2014.
*The first ten minutes of 28 Weeks Later is the maybe the most riveting opening sequence to a movie I've ever seen.
Dumb and Dumber sequel not dead after all...
Well this is good news.
Despite Jim Carrey saying several weeks back that the long talked about Dumb and Dumber sequel was deader than Petey the parrot, apparently the Farrelly brothers have pulled a Lloyd and reattached the head with some duct tape.
The directing/writing duo recently tweeted that the script for the sequel is almost complete. According to the brothers the tentative title is Dumb and Dumber To. Could you get a more perfect title? As for plot points, Bobby and Peter Farrelly were relatively vague about the story when they recently spoke to "Collider." We do know that the two have not matured in the past twenty years and the story revolves around one of the two having fathered a child. The father also apparently has a kidney problem and hopes the child will be a match. Hmmm. Interesting premise.
Honestly though I have my doubts about this film. The first Dumb and Dumber was just lightning in a bottle. I remember going to see it with my Mom and sister when I was fifteen and laughing my ass off. I just feel like no matter what happens this film will be a disappointment. Although if I set my expectations super low it may surprise me and turn out to be funny.
If all goes well Dumber and Dumber To is set to begin filming next Spring with a release date sometime in 2014.
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Warner Bros. fires producer Joel Silver
To quote Ron Burgundy this is "kind of a big deal."
Like Brigette Nielson and Flava Flav's romance, this relationship was destined to end badly. "Variety" reports that movie studio Warner Bros. and long time producer Joel Silver* have decided to call it quits after 25 years and dozens of films.
Although Silver produced many hits for Warner Bros. such as Lethal Weapon, Predator, Die Hard and The Matrix movies, recent years have not been so kind. Flops like The Reaping, Fred Claus and Ninja Assassin hurt both the studio and Silver. Couple this with the fact that Warner Bros. gave Silver advances based on a percentage of the box office expectations, and a wall between studio and producer grew that was ultimately unbreachable**.
Lest you feel heartbroken for the man, know that he is receiving $30 million from Warner Bros. for rights to 30 films under his Silver Pictures banner. He's also working on a current five year deal with Universal that entails 12 movies and will pay him $7 million a picture.
Although I'm a huge fan of Silver's pictures I've never been a fan of the man himself. He always came across as an arrogant, officious, control freak douche bag. But then again that probably sums up most of the producers in Hollywood. I'd like to wish Silver good luck in his new endeavors but at $7 million a film I don't think he needs it.
*Reportedly Joel Silver was the inspiration for the foul-mouthed studio exec Les Grossman played by Tom Cruise in 2008's Tropic Thunder and actor Kevin Spacey's crazy movie mogul character Buddy Ackerman in 1994's Swimming With Sharks.
**Warner Bros. also paid for Silver's 20 person staff, a personal driver, a personal projectionist for his home theater, and two bungalos on the Warner Bros. lot. WOW.
Ghostbusters 3 might be a reboot? Say What??!!
Something is definitely strange in the neighborhood.
Although recent reports by Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis indicate that Ghostbusters 3 is full steam ahead, if you believe director Ivan Reitman the waters may be muddier than initially thought.
"Collider" recently caught up with the iconic director who had this to say about the impending project: "I think Ghostbusters should probably be remade, if we can get it all right. We're working on it, so we'll see."
As geeked up as I am for another Ghostbusters film, Reitman's comments give me indigestion. I most certainly DO NOT want a reboot of the franchise. Ghostbusters is a gem in the annals of movie history. Why would anyone desecrate it with a torrid remake? If we're going to have a third film I'd rather it just be a straight sequel and have done.** Otherwise just throw the whole idea in the Ecto Containment Grid.
*I've made a unilateral decision to use this picture in every post about another Ghostbusters movie.
**I actually don't care anymore that Bill Murray's not apart of this project.
The actor who played a mountain of a man in "The Dark Knight Rises" set to tackle a mountain
Tom Hardy has quickly become one of my favorite actors. Warrior, The Dark Knight Rises, Bronson, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Inception--the guy brings new meaning to the phrase "method acting". At this point I'd probably watch him read the ingredients off of a box of Raisin Nut Bran.*
While the actor's next challenge won't be Batman, it's just as daunting--Mt. Everest. According to "Deadline" Hardy is in negotiations for the lead in Everest. The story follows the life of George Mallory, a British climber who tried to scale Mt. Everest in the 1930s only to meet his end. Screenwriter Sheldon Turner will adapt the screenplay from Jeffrey Archer's novel "Paths of Glory."
Tom Hardy vs the most famous mountain in the world? Sign me up.
*I take that back. I probably wouldn't see This Means War.
Enough "Robopocalypse" casting news to make an android's head explode!
Whew! My circuits are about to fry.
We've known for awhile now that the epic robot war science fiction picture Robopocalypse* was in the works, but we may now actually have some real casting news. Both "Heat Vision" and "The Hollywood Reporter" state that Thor actor Chris Hemsworth and recent The Dark Knight Rises actress Anne Hathaway are in negotiations to star in Steven Spielberg's upcoming feature. Nothing like adding in a couple headline actors to go with a star director.
For those of you who don't know what Robopocalypse is about, here's a brief synopsis of Daniel H. Wilson's novel:
In the near future, an increasingly robot-reliant society faces extinction after a computer scientist accidentally unleashes a sentient artificial intelligence named Archos. After failed attempts at making a non-homicidal artificial intelligence, the safeguards in a computer science lab are compromised. Archos, a supremely intelligent AI, becomes self-aware and immediately starts planning the decimation of human civilization in an attempt to preserve Earth's biodiversity. After infecting all penetrable networked electronic devices (cars, airplanes, elevators, robots, etc.) with a "precursor virus", Archos begins planning a systematic attack on the human race.
Additionally, "Variety" reports that actor Ben Whishaw will also be cast as computer hacker Lurker. Whishaw can next be seen as Q in November's Skyfall.
I have to say I'm pretty pumped for this movie. The novel was incredible and it's been awhile since we've seen Mr. Spielberg delve into the genre that he helped define. Don't get me wrong I'm sure Lincoln will be amazing but give me Jaws or Jurassic Park anyday.
Robopocalypse is set to release April 25, 2014.
A new Bond villain already????
We're just about seven weeks away from the opening of the next Bond film, Skyfall, and it looks like Sony and EON are wasting no time getting the 24th film rolling. So much so in fact that they may have already snagged their next villain.
According to "The Express," producers are looking at none other than Benedict Cumberbatch. I have to say I love the pick. Not only has Cumberbatch proven he's a great actor (check out his performance in Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy--simply phenomenal) but he's got some bonafide hits coming your way next year. Cumberbatch plays the main villain in May's Star Trek Into the Darkness and will voice one of the most famous dragons in literary history, Smaug, in next year's The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug.
A dragon and a "Star Trek" villain? How could this guy not make a good Bond villain? I'm sold.
Sony and EON want to start production on another Bond film next year with a projected release date of 2014. Nothing like making up for the four long years between Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Blu Ray and DVD releases this week!
*Blu Ray only
**DVD only
Here are the Blu Ray and DVD releases for Tuesday September 25th:
Bond 50*, The Avengers, Klown, Damsels in Distress, The Tall Man, Resident Evil: Damnation, The Game, Eating Raoul, Arachnophobia*, Lone Wolf and Cub*, The American President*, Dave*, Rescue Me (series)**, Family Guy Volume 10**, Desperate Housewives Season 8**, Desperate Housewives (series)**, CSI (Season 12)**, CSI: Miami (Season 10)**, CSI: New York (Season 8)**, Law and Order: SVU (Season 13)**, American Horror Story (Season 1), Portlandia (Season 2), Charlies Angels (series)**, Batman: The Dark Knight Returns Part I
Trailer for Jackie Robinson biopic "42" debuts
I hesitate to call former Brooklyn Dodgers Hall of Famer Jackie Robinson a baseball player because he was so much more than that. Not only did he break the color barrier in Major League Baseball, he became an iconic symbol of the civil rights movement and made America openly confront the heinous tumor of racism in the United States. In fact I'd go so far as to say that Jackie Robinson is one of the most important American citizens of the 20th century.
And soon his life* will be coming to a theater near you courtesy of Warner Bros. who just released this trailer for 42: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iP3G4E2ael8.
I have to say I was a little hesitant when I heard Harrison Ford was going to play Dodgers owner Branch Rickey. He certainly looks the part but almost seems like he's overacting in this trailer. I don't know. I hope I'm wrong. As a baseball fan I desperately want this to be a good movie because A) the source material makes for great drama and B) there are too few great sports movies being made anymore.
Overall the trailer suggests a marked degree of authenticity to the era although I wasn't exactly crazy about the rap music in the background. It came across slightly out of place. Oh well. Maybe that's just for the trailer.
42 hits theaters in April 2013, just in time for baseball season.
*Now that we have a biopic for Jackie Robinson can be PLEASE get one for Ted Williams already?
A Dragon sized second trailer for "The Hobbit" comin' at ya!!!
Unless you live in a hole (a Hobbit hole? bazinga!) you're probably aware that in a little over two months the first film of The Hobbit trilogy, entitled An Unexpected Journey, will release worldwide. Set 60 years before the events of The Lord of the Rings, Peter Jackson and company once again will delve into Tolkien's mythical Middle Earth.
Up until now the public has had only one trailer to whet it's appetite. However New Line Cinema has just released a brand new trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8s0AU3T6vJw for the upcoming fantasy adventure, just in time for the 75th anniversary of the novel's original publication*.
The second Hobbit trailer is just like a second pint of ale at The Green Dragon in The Shire--refreshing and just as good if not better than the first one. This trailer is somewhat lighter than the first, with a few more overtones of humor, especially the final shot. At the same time there is plenty of harrowing new images such as Bilbo confronting a goblin, the dwarves being chased by a vicious band of wargs, and of course the first meeting between the Baggins clan and the creature Gollum. (Incidentally the CGI representation of Gollum looks even better than it did ten years ago. Props to WETA digital.) I was also impressed by the map room in Rivendell as well as a shot of Gandalf's fellow wizard Radagast--riding a wagon pulled by giant rabbits no less!**
While I feel that these films are unlikely to live up to The Lord of the Rings movies, it sure gets a fanboy like me incredibly excited and it's guaranteed to rake in a ton of cash.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey hits theaters December 14th.
*Incidentally yesterday September 22nd was not only the first day of Autumn, it is also the birthday for both Bilbo and Frodo Baggins.
**Radagast never appears in either The Hobbit or The Lord of the Rings but is only mentioned by Gandalf in those novels. A prime example of how Peter Jackson is going outside of the box to bring us some unexpected material in these upcoming movies.
Saturday, September 22, 2012
This is just reprehensible!!!!
I have an extremely twisted and sick sense of humor. Laughter is an essential part of the human condition and I firmly believe it's a long life if you can't laugh at yourself. The fact that I have a sick sense of humor explains why it takes a lot to offend me. I like to think I'm pretty tolerant.
But even I have my limits.
It is my unfortunate and sad duty to report the following story, even though part of me wishes I didn't have to. Website "Arrow in the Head" reports that a new independent zombie film will soon be released titled Towers of Terror. That's right people! Director Matt Gibson and his cast of jackwagons thought it would be a fantastic idea to do a film about 9/11 and add zombies! For those of you wanting to know the plot here it is:
On September 11, 2001, two groups decide to race to the top of each of the World Trade Center buildings. The towers are hit by terrorist attacks, but the terrorists don't die in the plane crash; they resurrect as zombies hell-bent on their mission to destroy America. As these undead jihadists continue on their path of destruction armed with box-cutters and nail-clippers, the Americans must learn to stand united in their patriotism or else face gruesome death in twin 110 story bloodbaths!
Look I'm fervently against censorship and I think maybe the best thing about this country is that it provides people the freedom to produce mind numbing dreck like Towers of Terror without physical reprecussions. However, this odious abortion of a movie repulses me to the core of my soul. How could anyone, ANYONE possibly think that THIS would be a good idea for a movie?? Why in God's name would anyone take the most horrific attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor and use it as a platform for a zombie schlock fest?! Not only is it insulting and disrepectful to the men and women who lost their lives on September 11, 2001, it is a visual right cross to the collective jaws of their surviving family members.
Director Matt Gibson must be a hit with the ladies. The guy could probably talk a nun into giving him fellatio. Not since Anne Boleyn's executioner convinced her he was just going to "take a little off the top" has there been a man this persuasive. I mean he has to be right? How else could one explain being able to convince a studio to put up real legitimate greenbacks to fund this reprehensible excuse for cinema?
Moreover, (and believe me when I say this is way down on the totem pole next to the obvious major affront of this movie) it denegrates the quality of zombie media. Garbage like Towers of Terror severely undermines solid television like "The Walking Dead" and spits on the social relevance of George Romero's 1968 classic Night of the Living Dead.
As I said I'm against censorship. Thomas Jefferson I believe once said, "I may not agree with what you say sir but I will fight to the death to make sure you have the freedom to say it!" That's the way I feel about this film. I would never try to censor or intentionally prevent the distribution of a movie. Having said that I choose not to see this film and I sincerely hope that the director, cast, and crew never get a job in Hollywood again. That probably won't happen but maybe they'll at least be ashamed enough not to put it on their resume.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
DVD/Blu Ray releases for this week!
*Blu Ray only
**DVD only
Here are the Blu Ray and DVD releases for Tuesday September 11th:
Snow White and the Huntsman, What to Expect When You're Expecting, Your Sister's Sister, Goats, Lola Versus, Killer Klowns from Outer Space*, Ghosts of the Abyss*, 30 Rock Season 6**, The Big Bang Theory Season 5, The Vampire Diaries Season 3, Spartacus: Vengeance Season 2, Private Practice Season 5**, Castle Season 4**, Up All Night Season 1**, Terra Nova The Complete Series**
**DVD only
Here are the Blu Ray and DVD releases for Tuesday September 11th:
Snow White and the Huntsman, What to Expect When You're Expecting, Your Sister's Sister, Goats, Lola Versus, Killer Klowns from Outer Space*, Ghosts of the Abyss*, 30 Rock Season 6**, The Big Bang Theory Season 5, The Vampire Diaries Season 3, Spartacus: Vengeance Season 2, Private Practice Season 5**, Castle Season 4**, Up All Night Season 1**, Terra Nova The Complete Series**
Everyone's a critic! But not everyone is THE critic
There's very few critics that I actually admire. Most I think are pompous, self righteous asshats who wish they were movie stars. The pretentiousness of some movie critics just gets me. You're writing a film review not splitting the atom genius! That's why I've always stated on this blog that my comments, reviews, and critiques are simply opinions. I write this blog because I love movies and because I hope it's a place where people can come and be entertained. Maybe even have a laugh or two.
Having said that I have the utmost respect for Roger Ebert. The man is a legend in the industry and his famous thumbs up has become an iconic gesture in American culture. While I didn't always agree with his reviews (his lambasting of 2000's Gladiator was way off base in my opinion) his critiques were well thought out, intelligent, and entertaining.
That's why it pleases me to no end that this American icon (yeah I said it!) is finally getting his just due on the big screen in the form of a documentary. Noted movie industry names Steve James (Hoop Dreams), screen writer Steve Zaillian (Schindler's List), and Martin Scorsese (Raging Bull) are banding together to make a documentary based on Ebert's recent memoir.* If you're going to do a film on arguably the best movie critic ever, you might as well have an all-star lineup doing the film. (After all I couldn't see Uwe Boll directing this thing.)
No timetable has been set for filming or a release date but if I had to guess probably sometime late next year....just in time for awards season.
*Ebert continues to write film reviews despite the fact that his battles with cancer have rendered him unable to eat, drink, or speak. Now THAT'S passion for one's craft.
The Wolfpack busts loose as "The Hangover Part III" begins shooting
Like it or not when Hollywood sees a hot commodity (aka straight cash) they will milk that sucker until it dies. While I didn't think The Hangover Part II was that bad, it certainly pales in comparison to the original. And as for a Hangover III? Well I think it's just unnecessary. But I don't make the decisions at Warner Bros. and the studio is bravely forging ahead with the latest adventures for the Wolfpack.
Although there has been much idle speculation as to what the third and (hopefully) final installment might entail, Warner Bros. released this little nugget to commemorate the start of shooting: "This time there's no wedding. No bachelor party. What could go wrong right? But when the Wolfpack hits the road, all bets are off."
This tells me one thing: road trip. Hmmm a road trip movie. I'm not sure if anyone's ever done that before! Oh wait....
The Hangover Part III opens May 24, 2013.
James Cameron planning for three more Avatar films with the fourth being a prequel
Can't blame a director for having vision I guess, and James Cameron certainly has that in spades.
According to "MTV" and "MovieZine," the Academy Award winning director is planning not one, not two, but three followup films to the 2009 smash hit Avatar. The plan is apparently for Cameron to shoot the next two films back to back, with both focusing this time on Pandora's oceans*. (And here we go with the environment stuff again!**)
Cameron apparently is still refining the scripts and states that the reason shooting has still not begun is because "we don't want it done the same prototypical way as the first one, we want it to be a much more smoother workflow just for creativity reasons." I hope by non "prototypical" he means not "Pocahontas in Space" like the first one was.***
The popular director goes on to say that he has plans for a prequel should the second and third films prove successful. Although he hasn't written anything yet, the proposed fourth film would focus on the original visits to Pandora and begin about 35 years before the first film. Cameron is quick to point out that he isn't trying to imitate Star Wars. (A huge action space saga in three parts then another that explores the origins in <likely> three parts? How could anyone ever misconstrue that as Star Wars?)
Cameron plans to focus on the Avatar sequels over the next four or five years and while the plan is to have the first of the sequels out by Christmas 2014 I seriously doubt that is feasible at this point.
*Cameron's 1989 film "The Abyss" also about oceans is a severely underrated film.
**I have to respect Cameron's passion for the environment and that the environmental message was very much out in the open unlike say "Happy Feet."
***I know this article is coming off as if I think the first "Avatar" was a giant pile of crap but that's actually not how I feel. It's a good movie but not that original.
And the Star Trek sequel title is......
Principal photography on J.J. Abrams Star Trek sequel has been in the tank for several weeks now, and while fans anxiously await a trailer, in the meantime they do have a definitive title.
The latest adventure for Kirk, Spock, McCoy, and the rest of the Enterprise crew will be called Star Trek Into the Darkness. That's right. No numbers, no Roman numerals, and apparently no colons either.
I have to say I really like the title. It gives it an edge while lending an air of mystery to what the title actually means. Could it be a black hole? The space between the stars? Who knows. I also like the fact that the title distinguishes itself from the two previous movie incarnations of Star Trek. The first six films used Roman numerals for the sequels and TNG used colons. The lack of both highlights a separation of this franchise between the last two. Here's to hoping Abrams' sequel is just as good as the original.
Star Trek Into the Darkness warps into movie theaters May 17, 2013.
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
DVD and Blu Ray releases for the week of September 3rd!!
*Blu Ray only
**DVD only
Here are the DVD/Blu Ray releases for Tuesday September 4th:
The Five Year Engagement, Safe, Piranha 3DD, Umberto D.*, Reanimator*, Abbot and Costello Meet Frankenstein*, Airport*, Hocus Pocus*, The Hand that Rocks the Cradle*, Cold Creek Manor*, Mother's Day*, Mad Monster Party*, Parks and Recreation Season 4**, The Office Season 8, Bored to Death Season 3, Hung Season 3, How to Make it in America Season 2, Grey's Anatomy Season 8**, Criminal Minds Season 7**, Fringe Season 4, The Good Wife Season 2**, Haven Season 2, 2 Broke Girls Season 1, Person of Interest Season 1, Ninja Turtles the Next Mutation Volume 1
Also this Friday September 7th: Harry Potter Wizard's Collection all 8 films
New title for the second Hobbit film and updated release dates
Unless you've been living in a hobbit hole, you probably know that Peter Jackson's latest Middle-Earth magnum opus has been split into three films. The real question however was what did this mean to the titles and release dates of the films.
Well now we have an answer.
According to thehobbitblog.com, the second film has been retitled The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug and will be released December 13, 2013. The third and final film will be released just seven months later (a la Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows) on July 18, 2014. It will be titled The Hobbit: There and Back Again, which was the original title of the second film.
You know I've resigned myself to these changes and while I'm not naive enough to think that this is just about telling a full story (maximizing profits anyone?) I'm completely fine with making this into a trilogy as long as the films are good. I've said that all along. The announcement about the title of the second film makes me feel good because it means I won't have to wait until July of 2014 to see the dragon Smaug. Let's just hope Peter Jackson doesn't decide to split the movie into four parts with the fourth film titled The Hobbit: Copyright Page.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey releases December 14th of this year.
R.I.P. Michael Clarke Duncan
Gregarious and larger than life actor Michael Clarke Duncan has died due to complications arising from a July 13th heart attack. He was 54 years old.
The six foot five 315 pound Chicago native, Duncan began his career in Hollywood as a body guard for such celebrities as Will Smith, Martin Lawrence, Jamie Foxx, LL Cool J, and The Notorious B.I.G. Although his first recognizable role was as Bear in the 1998 film Armageddon, that film would be the turning point in Duncan's career. He struck up a friendship with Bruce Willis, and Willis's influence helped Duncan receive his Oscar nominated role as John Coffey in the 1999 film The Green Mile.
From there Duncan went on to star in such movies as The Whole Nine Yards, Daredevil, and Sin City and made guest appearances in shows like "Family Guy" and "Two and Half Men."
More than just an actor, Duncan also was very active in the community and did PSAs for stroke prevention. He was also an avid fan of the Chicago White Sox.
On a personal note I have to say that Duncan's death struck me a little harder than I expected it to. In a town full of phonies, he just seemed like one of the more sincere and genuine people Hollywood had to offer. I will never forget his poignant and heart wrenching role as John Coffey in The Green Mile. His loss to actor Michael Caine for the Best Support Actor Oscar is one of the greater injustices in Academy Award history.
It's sad to think that none of us will get to see that winning smile and hear that boisterous laugh, watch those keen eyes, or listen to that captivating deep bass voice ever again. Farewell Michael Clarke Duncan. The movie world will miss you.
And so will I.
Review: Total Recall
Plot: Based loosely on the 1966 Philip K. Dick short story "We Can Remember It For You Wholesale," 2012's Total Recall is also a reboot of the 1990 Schwarzenegger classic. The story follows Douglas Quaid (Colin Farrell) a disenchanted late 21st century factory worker who feels dissatisfied with his life. Believing that something is missing from his daily existence, Doug travels to Rekall, a company specializing in giving people its customers fake memories that seem like the real thing. However when the implantation process goes horribly awry, Doug suddenly finds himself fleeing from people trying to kill him including his wife Lori (Kate Beckinsale) and Chancellor Vilos Cohaagen (Bryan Cranston). Only the mysterious Melina (Jessica Biel) may hold the key to unlocking Quaid's memories and destroying a corrupt and tyrannical Earth government.
Review: For better or for worse, reboots are here to stay. Call it nostalgia, call it lack of original ideas, or even call it a quick cash grab; the fact is that film reboots/remakes/reimaginings will continue to flourish as long as people clamour for them.
With the recent reboot of Total Recall I don't expect the clamouring to cease, but I certainly hope it will die down a little.
The producers of this film obviously got the title wrong. This film should have been called Total Disaster rather than Total Recall. Rarely have I seen an action/science fiction film (and I use those words in the loosest sense possible) be this monumentally bad. At one point I actually fell asleep in the theater. Considering science fiction films are right in my wheelhouse, that last sentence speaks volumes. In Total Recall, director Len Wiseman creates a dystopian future blander and more uninteresting than a week old rice cake. Aside from the first fifteen minutes or so this film only knows one pace: fast and out of control. Wiseman relies more on spectacle than substance and character development is severely lacking. Furthermore, the film is shot in a shoddy gray pastiche that aims for Blade Runner, misses, and lands squarely on Charlie Brown with a rain cloud over his head. Pathetic.
Kurt Wimmer and Mark Bomback's script also leaves much to be desired. Most of the characters are more transparent than a Katy Perry dress and have just as much substance as one of the pop singer's songs. The three boobed chick from the 1990 version had more depth than the entire cast combined. It's as if Wimmer and Bomback expected explosions, CGI, and set design to gloss over the shoddy dialogue and lack of scene tension. The script possesses none of the charm or nuance of Jon Povill's 1990 script. Wimmer and Bomback also made the "brilliant" decision not to involve Mars in the script. Instead they replace the Mars aspect with a story that revolves around a world elevator that travels through the center of the Earth. The elevator serves as a symbol of repression by the upper class elite over the severely underpaid workers. Of course there is a Resistance movement, but the plot is about as compelling as watching my cat chase his tail. Wait I take that back. That's an insult to my cat.
If you're looking for hard core science fiction action you'll find it in abundance in this version of Total Recall. I have to admit that the CGI and special effects were quite good and Harry Gregson-Williams' score reflected Total Recall's fast paced action.
I wish I could say the same for the acting. While Colin Farrell was decent in this film he's definitely no Arnie. Farrell comes across as more brooding and introspective than Arnie ever was in the original. It put me off. Unfortunately, Farrell's performance, as mediocre as it was, was the acting highlight of this film. To say that Kate Beckinsale only received this role because she's married to the director is an insult to nepotism. Too bad her solid fight scenes couldn't make her into a believable villain. Speaking of villains Bryan Cranston's (who by the way I think is an amazing actor) role as Cohaagen is absolutely abysmal. There's none of the sleaze or ruthlessness that actor Ronnie Cox brought to the role twenty two years ago. Cox's performance is so far and above Cranston's rendition that the 2012 version of Cohaagen looks like "Phineas and Ferb's" Doctor Doofenschmirtz by comparison. And Jessica Biel? Let's just say that if her performances continue like this, she's shortly only going to be referred to as Mrs. Justin Timberlake.
At the end of the day the 2012 version of Total Recall is nothing but a total disappointment.
My rating: 2/10
My rating for the 1990 version: 9/10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)